Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires data centers to pay fair taxes and follow infrastructure rules.
The problem
Data centers use significant resources and infrastructure but may not pay their fair share of local taxes or follow community rules.
The proposal
The bill makes data centers pay taxes fairly and comply with infrastructure standards. Exact details are not yet public.
The impact
Data centers, tech companies, local communities, and taxpayers are affected by new tax rules and infrastructure requirements.
Data centers would pay taxes based on their actual resource use and community impact. This could generate revenue for schools and local services.
Data centers would follow same infrastructure rules as other businesses. This ensures they don't avoid responsible development standards.
Additional tax revenue could fund roads, utilities, and services used by data centers. Communities benefit from having tech companies contribute fairly.
Data centers may face higher tax bills and compliance expenses. Companies might pass costs to customers or avoid certain locations.
Stricter rules and higher taxes could discourage data centers from building in certain areas. This might slow technological development.
Determining fair taxes and infrastructure requirements across different regions is complicated. Rules could be unclear or inconsistently applied.
The bill's specific requirements are not yet public. Final rules could be significantly different from current expectations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.