Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires AI chatbot companies to protect user data and privacy.
The problem
AI chatbots collect large amounts of personal user data. There are concerns about data breaches, misuse, and lack of security standards across different companies.
The proposal
The bill would require AI chatbot providers to implement data privacy and security measures. Companies must follow standards to protect user information.
The impact
AI chatbot users gain privacy protections. Tech companies must invest in security. Affects consumers, tech companies, and data protection practices.
Users' personal information would be safer from hackers and misuse. Companies would need to follow strong security rules. This protects millions of people who use chatbots daily.
Businesses would know exactly what privacy standards they must meet. This creates a level playing field so all companies follow the same rules.
When people know their data is protected, they're more willing to use AI services. This could help the AI industry grow responsibly.
Required security measures reduce the risk of major data leaks. This protects individuals from identity theft and fraud.
Tech companies will spend money building new security systems. This could increase prices for consumers or slow down innovation.
The bill summary doesn't specify exact security standards. Companies might disagree about what counts as adequate protection.
Large companies can afford expensive security teams. Small AI startups might struggle with costs and compliance, reducing competition.
Monitoring and enforcing rules across many companies is difficult. Regulations might be inconsistently applied.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.