Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates penalties for companies that pollute the environment.
The problem
Pollution harms public health and the environment. Current penalties may not be strong enough to stop companies from polluting.
The proposal
Bill would establish new penalties and fines for businesses that pollute. It would be enforced by Natural Resources and Transportation committees.
The impact
Polluting companies would face stricter rules and higher costs. Environmental groups and communities affected by pollution could see improvements.
The bill aims to discourage companies from polluting by making penalties tougher. This could lead to cleaner air and water in communities.
Reducing pollution can improve health outcomes, especially in communities near factories or highways. This could lower medical costs and improve quality of life.
Companies that pollute gain unfair advantages over competitors who follow rules. Stronger penalties make competition fairer for responsible businesses.
Higher penalties motivate companies to invest in cleaner equipment and processes. This can drive innovation in green technology.
Companies may pass penalty costs to consumers through higher prices for goods and services. Lower-income families could be most affected.
Small companies might struggle more with new penalties than large corporations. Some businesses could relocate or close down.
The bill summary is not available, so it's unclear how penalties would work or what specific actions trigger them. This creates uncertainty for businesses.
Enforcing penalties fairly and consistently could be difficult. Resources needed for monitoring and prosecution might be limited.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.