Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Requires the government to assess how terrorists might use artificial intelligence technology.
The problem
Artificial intelligence technology is advancing rapidly. Government officials worry terrorists could use AI to plan attacks or cause harm. There is no current system to evaluate these risks.
The proposal
The bill directs federal agencies to study and report on how terrorists might use generative AI. It requires assessments of the danger level and recommendations to prevent misuse.
The impact
Federal security agencies must conduct new research and create reports. Taxpayers fund this work. AI companies may face new oversight or requirements.
Studying AI terrorism risks before major incidents occur allows government to prepare defenses. Early detection of dangerous AI uses could prevent attacks.
Understanding how terrorists might use AI helps protect Americans and infrastructure. This information helps agencies coordinate better responses.
A detailed government assessment provides facts for making smart rules about AI safety. Congress can use this information to pass better laws later.
The assessment could lead to working with other countries on AI safety. Shared knowledge helps everyone defend against threats.
Government agencies must conduct studies, hire experts, and produce reports. This requires budget funding that could go elsewhere.
New oversight could discourage companies from developing certain AI technologies. This might reduce American competitiveness in AI research.
Increased government monitoring of AI development could threaten privacy rights. People worry about government tracking lawful AI research.
Government might overestimate AI terrorism threats and create unnecessary restrictions. This could harm beneficial AI uses without real security gains.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.