Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Regulates how college recruitment treats athletes with professional social media status.
The problem
College athletes with large social media followings may receive unfair recruiting advantages. This creates unequal competition among student-athletes seeking college sports opportunities.
The proposal
The bill establishes rules preventing athletes with professional social media status from gaining special recruitment treatment. It ensures college recruiting focuses on athletic ability rather than influencer status.
The impact
College athletes, coaches, and recruiters must follow new recruitment guidelines. Athletes with large social media audiences face recruitment restrictions. College sports programs adjust recruiting practices.
Creates equal opportunity for all student-athletes regardless of social media popularity. Focuses college recruitment on actual athletic talent and ability. Levels the playing field for athletes without large online followings.
Prevents young athletes from prioritizing social media over academics and training. Keeps recruitment based on sports performance rather than influencer status. May reduce pressure on athletes to build personal brands early.
Ensures colleges recruit based on proven athletic merit and performance. Improves overall team quality by focusing on sports ability. Maintains integrity of college sports competitions.
The bill's exact definition of 'X-pro status' is not provided. Enforcement could be inconsistent or difficult to implement. Schools might disagree on which athletes qualify as subject to restrictions.
Restricting athletes based on social media presence raises First Amendment questions. Athletes' personal social media activity may conflict with recruitment rules. Legal challenges could delay or block implementation.
Coaches and recruiters must track and verify athlete social media status. Compliance monitoring creates administrative costs and complexity. New training and procedures needed across athletic departments.
Athletes might hide or delete social media accounts to avoid restrictions. Wealthy families could hire management to reduce visible online presence. Could penalize athletes who built followings before college recruiting age.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.