Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires federal agencies to buy uniforms and apparel made in America instead of overseas.
The problem
Federal agencies currently purchase uniforms and apparel from various sources, some overseas. This bill addresses concerns about supporting domestic manufacturing and keeping production jobs in the United States.
The proposal
The bill would require federal agencies to purchase uniforms and apparel from American manufacturers and suppliers rather than importing them from other countries.
The impact
Federal agencies, domestic textile manufacturers, and workers in the apparel industry are affected. Costs may change for government budgets, and domestic manufacturing jobs could increase or decrease depending on implementation.
Requiring domestic purchases could increase demand for American textile and apparel manufacturers. This could create or preserve manufacturing jobs in the United States.
Supporting American manufacturers helps build a stronger domestic supply chain. This reduces dependence on foreign producers for government needs.
Using taxpayer money for American-made products aligns with supporting the domestic economy. Many Americans support government purchases benefiting American workers and businesses.
American-made products may cost more than overseas alternatives. This could increase government spending on uniforms and apparel across federal agencies.
Restricting purchases to domestic suppliers reduces choices available to agencies. This could limit competition and quality options.
Other countries might view this as unfair trade practice and retaliate. This could create tension with trading partners and affect other American businesses.
Ensuring compliance and tracking American-made products requires new systems and oversight. Administrative costs could add to the overall expense.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.