Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to close gaps in telecommunications infrastructure and access across America.
The problem
Some Americans lack reliable internet and phone service, especially in rural areas. Telecom companies may not see profit in serving less populated regions.
The proposal
The bill likely aims to expand broadband and telephone coverage to underserved communities. Details are unavailable as no official summary has been provided.
The impact
Rural residents and underserved communities would gain better internet and phone access. Telecommunications companies would face new requirements or incentives.
Rural Americans could get faster, more reliable internet service. This helps students do homework, farmers run businesses, and families access services online.
Better connectivity attracts businesses to underserved areas. Remote workers and new companies could create jobs in these communities.
Better phone and internet coverage helps emergency responders reach people in crisis. Rural areas could get faster help during fires, accidents, and medical emergencies.
Students in remote areas need internet for online learning and research. Better connectivity closes the homework and learning opportunity gap.
Expanding telecom infrastructure is expensive. Taxpayers may foot a large bill, or the government may redirect funds from other programs.
Companies might face costly requirements to build infrastructure in unprofitable areas. This could raise prices for all customers or reduce company investments elsewhere.
Building infrastructure in remote areas is difficult and time-consuming. The bill might take years to show real results for communities.
Without details, it is unclear how success will be measured or who is responsible if the program fails to deliver promised services.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.