Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill would stop people from using SNAP food benefits at restaurants.
The problem
Some argue SNAP recipients use benefits at restaurants instead of buying groceries. Supporters say this wastes government funds meant for essential food needs.
The proposal
The bill would prohibit SNAP recipients from using their benefits to purchase prepared meals at restaurants. Only grocery stores and food retailers selling unprepared food could accept SNAP.
The impact
Low-income families and elderly or disabled people who use SNAP would lose restaurant meal options. Restaurant owners and workers could see reduced sales and employment.
Supporters argue SNAP should focus on groceries rather than restaurant meals. This keeps the program targeted toward core nutrition needs for struggling families.
Some claim restricting restaurant purchases could reduce SNAP program spending. This might free up funds for other needs or reduce government costs.
Encouraging grocery purchases over restaurant meals could promote home meal preparation. This might lead to healthier eating habits and better nutrition.
Elderly, disabled, and homeless SNAP users often rely on restaurants for meals. Removing this option could worsen food insecurity for vulnerable groups.
Many low-wage restaurant employees depend on SNAP customer sales. Reduced sales could lead to job losses in hospitality and food service.
Implementing restrictions requires new systems to prevent restaurant SNAP use. This creates costs for enforcement, compliance, and system changes.
Current SNAP rules already restrict restaurant purchases in most cases. Evidence suggests this change may have minimal effect on actual spending.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.