Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Addresses how workers are taxed when they work across multiple states.
The problem
Workers employed in multiple states may face unclear or overlapping tax rules. This creates confusion about which state can tax their income and how much they owe.
The proposal
The bill would establish consistent rules for how states tax workers who work in more than one state, aiming to reduce tax complications and conflicts between state tax systems.
The impact
Remote workers, traveling employees, and multistate companies would face clearer tax rules. Reduces confusion about state tax obligations and potential double-taxation situations.
Workers would know exactly which state taxes their income and how much they owe. This reduces confusion and makes tax filing simpler for people who work across state lines.
More people now work from home or move between states. Clear rules would make it easier for remote workers to understand their tax duties.
States sometimes disagree over who can tax the same income. Uniform rules would prevent states from both trying to tax the same worker.
Clearer rules mean companies spend less money on accounting and tax compliance. This saves businesses money that could go to wages or hiring.
Some states might collect less tax revenue if this bill limits their ability to tax workers. States may need to cut services or raise other taxes to make up the difference.
The bill might reduce state control over tax rules within their borders. States value the ability to set their own tax policies for their residents.
Creating uniform rules across all 50 states is complicated. Different states have very different tax systems, making it hard to create one-size-fits-all rules.
Without an official summary, it is unclear exactly what rules the bill creates. The specific details matter greatly for who benefits and who loses.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.