Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Transportation and Infrastructure, Financial Services, Education and Workforce, Natural Resources, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a national infrastructure bank to fund and finance infrastructure projects across America.
The problem
America's infrastructure needs significant investment. Current funding mechanisms are fragmented and insufficient for large-scale projects like roads, bridges, and transit systems.
The proposal
Establishes a federally chartered National Infrastructure Bank to provide loans, grants, and credit support for qualifying infrastructure projects nationwide.
The impact
Affects project developers, state/local governments, construction workers, and taxpayers through new funding access and potential debt obligations.
Creates a dedicated institution to coordinate and finance major infrastructure projects. This could streamline the process of funding roads, bridges, water systems, and transit. It may reduce fragmentation across existing federal programs.
Infrastructure investment can create construction jobs and support economic activity. A national bank could accelerate project timelines. Improved infrastructure may enhance business productivity and competitiveness.
A national bank could attract private investment alongside public funds. This leverages private capital for public projects. It may reduce strain on government budgets while advancing infrastructure goals.
A centralized institution could establish consistent evaluation criteria and standards. This may improve project quality and accountability. Clear standards could reduce waste and inefficiency.
Creates a new federal institution requiring startup funding and ongoing operations. This increases federal expenditures and potentially national debt. Opponents may argue resources should go to deficit reduction instead.
A new federal bank adds another layer of bureaucracy to infrastructure decision-making. Project approval processes could remain slow or become more complicated. Implementation risks and administrative overhead could offset efficiency gains.
Federal funding decisions may reflect political interests rather than objective economic need. Politically connected regions might receive preferential treatment. This could lead to wasteful spending on low-priority projects.
If the bank provides loans, some projects may struggle to repay. Defaults could cost taxpayers money. Risk assessment and loan conditions become critical to success.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5639
Portal for Appraisal Licensing Act of 2026
S 1564
Floodplain Enhancement and Recovery Act
HR 1190
Expanding Access to Capital for Rural Job Creators Act
HR 7730
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.