Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a Chief Development Officer position at the U.S. International Development Corporation.
The problem
The U.S. International Development Corporation may lack high-level leadership focused specifically on development strategy and policy coordination.
The proposal
Establishes a Chief Development Officer role to lead development initiatives and coordinate policy at the U.S. International Development Corporation.
The impact
U.S. international development staff gain clearer leadership structure. Development programs may receive more focused oversight and strategy.
A dedicated Chief Development Officer creates a single point of leadership for development strategy. This helps coordinate efforts across different programs and reduces confusion about who makes key decisions.
Having a senior officer devoted specifically to development issues ensures this area receives high-level attention. It signals that development is a priority within the organization.
A Chief Development Officer can work across departments to align development programs with broader U.S. foreign policy goals. This reduces duplication and improves efficiency.
Creating a new executive position requires salary, staff, and office expenses. This adds to the federal budget without clear estimates of the financial impact.
The bill summary provides limited details about what this officer actually does or their specific powers. Vague job descriptions can lead to confusion and overlap with existing roles.
Adding a new leadership layer could slow decision-making by requiring additional approvals. More layers sometimes make organizations less, not more, efficient.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.