Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents male students from joining women's sports teams at military service academies.
The problem
Some debate exists about fairness in women's sports at military academies regarding athlete eligibility and team composition.
The proposal
The bill would prohibit male students from participating in athletic programs designated for women or girls at military service academies like West Point, Annapolis, and the Air Force Academy.
The impact
Male and female students at military service academies would face restrictions on which sports teams they can join based on gender designation of the program.
Ensures that athletic scholarships and roster spots at academies remain available for female athletes. Keeps women's teams focused on female participation and competition.
Military academies have historically organized some teams by gender. This bill reinforces that established organizational structure.
Clear rules about team eligibility could prevent complaints or legal challenges about fairness in academy sports.
Male students interested in women's sports would be barred from participating. Restricts individual freedom to choose which team to join based on ability or interest.
Academies may struggle to fill rosters if not enough students of the designated gender are available. Could weaken some women's teams by limiting recruitment options.
May face constitutional questions about gender-based restrictions on participation. Could lead to costly legal battles in federal court.
Academies would need to enforce and monitor eligibility rules without additional funding or guidance provided by the bill.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 4668
Protect College Sports Act of 2026
HR 9723
Fit Future Act
HRES 1487
Recognizing the 1960 University of Missouri Tigers Football Team for its undefeated regular season, Orange Bowl victory, and claim to the 1960 National Championship.
HRES 1482
Recognizing 100 years of American Legion Baseball and the American Legion World Series, and honoring the city of Shelby, North Carolina, for serving as the permanent home of the American Legion World Series.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.