Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to develop and recruit cyber talent for U.S. armed forces and national security.
The problem
The U.S. military and defense agencies struggle to recruit and retain skilled cybersecurity workers in competitive job markets.
The proposal
Creates programs to identify, train, and recruit cybersecurity experts for military and defense roles through education and recruitment initiatives.
The impact
Military cybersecurity workforce, young people interested in tech careers, and defense contractors are affected by new recruitment and training programs.
A larger pool of skilled cyber professionals helps protect military systems and critical infrastructure from digital attacks. This improves America's ability to defend against foreign cyber threats.
New training and recruitment programs offer well-paying jobs for young people interested in technology. These positions provide stable careers in growing fields.
The military has difficulty finding qualified cyber workers. This bill directly tackles that shortage by developing talent pipelines and training programs.
Having better-trained cyber personnel gives the U.S. military an edge in digital warfare and defense compared to potential adversaries.
New training programs and recruitment efforts require taxpayer funding. The bill doesn't specify total costs, which could be substantial.
Military recruitment may pull talented cyber workers away from private companies and startups that also need these skills for innovation.
Without an official summary, it's unclear what specific programs the bill creates or how money will be spent. This makes full evaluation difficult.
Recruiting cyber talent is only half the problem. The military must also keep workers long-term, which may require competitive salaries and working conditions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.