Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to help workers move between jobs and careers more easily.
The problem
Workers may face barriers when changing jobs or careers, including licensing requirements, credential recognition, or skill training gaps that vary by state.
The proposal
Legislation likely seeks to reduce barriers to job mobility through credential portability, skills recognition, or training assistance across state lines.
The impact
Workers gain easier job transitions; employers access broader talent pools; states may need to coordinate credential standards and licensing.
Workers can move to new jobs without starting over with credentials. This helps people find better-paying work and career growth. Families gain flexibility to relocate for employment.
Employers can hire qualified workers from other states without long credential delays. This helps fill job openings faster and reduces labor shortages in competitive fields.
Workers switching careers may receive help with retraining or skill development. This supports economic transitions and helps people adapt to changing job markets.
Better job matching and worker mobility can boost productivity and economic activity. Labor moves to where it is needed most, improving overall efficiency.
States maintain different professional standards for safety and quality. Loosening these could create inconsistent protections in regulated fields like healthcare or construction. Public safety concerns may arise.
States traditionally control licensing and credentials within their borders. Federal mobility requirements may conflict with state rights and reduce local control over professional standards.
States and employers need new systems to verify credentials across borders. Development and administration costs could be significant and burden smaller states.
Different states train and certify workers differently. Accepting credentials from lower-standard regions could reduce quality in professions requiring high expertise.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.