Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Authorizes U.S. security partnership and counterterrorism assistance to Mali.
The problem
Mali faces significant terrorist threats from extremist groups. The U.S. seeks to support Mali's military capacity to combat terrorism and maintain regional stability in West Africa.
The proposal
The bill likely authorizes military aid, training, equipment, and cooperative security arrangements between the U.S. and Mali to strengthen counterterrorism operations.
The impact
Affects U.S. foreign policy toward Mali, Mali's military capabilities, counterterrorism efforts in West Africa, and U.S. military engagement in the region.
Supporting Mali's military can help counter terrorist groups operating in West Africa. This may reduce extremist activities and improve stability in the Sahel region.
Building partnerships with Mali advances U.S. counterterrorism goals and maintains influence in an important geopolitical region.
Better-equipped Malian forces may more effectively protect civilians from terrorist attacks and violence in affected areas.
Supporting local forces through partnership may be more economical than direct U.S. military intervention in the region.
The bill likely authorizes spending on foreign military aid, which uses U.S. taxpayer funds that could address domestic needs.
Mali has experienced recent political instability and military coups. Aid could support an unstable or authoritarian government rather than democratic institutions.
U.S. military aid to foreign governments raises concerns about oversight, proper use of equipment, and potential human rights violations.
Military assistance does not guarantee success against terrorism. Complex regional conflicts may not be resolved through security partnerships alone.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.