Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows workers to take family leave to participate in school activities for their children.
The problem
Working parents may struggle to attend important school events and activities due to job constraints. This limits parental involvement in education.
The proposal
Creates a family leave program allowing employees time off to participate in their children's school-related events and educational activities.
The impact
Working parents gain flexibility to attend school events. Employers adjust staffing. Schools may see increased parental participation.
Parents can attend school events without fear of losing their job or pay. This supports their children's education and development. Research shows parental involvement improves student outcomes.
When parents participate in school activities, students often perform better academically and behaviorally. Children see their parents value education.
Employees can better balance family and work responsibilities. This may reduce stress and improve job satisfaction for working parents.
Lower-income parents who cannot afford to take unpaid time off benefit most. This helps level the playing field in school involvement.
Employers must cover absences through temporary staff or overtime pay. This adds expenses, especially for small businesses with limited budgets.
The bill lacks detail about which school activities qualify, how much time is allowed, and whether it applies to all employers. This creates confusion.
Increased time off means interrupted work and potential delays on projects. Businesses may struggle to maintain output levels.
Enforcing and administering the program requires federal resources and oversight. Compliance monitoring adds complexity.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.