Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 2.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Establishes international oversight mechanisms for artificial intelligence development and deployment.
The problem
AI development proceeds with limited international coordination. Different countries have varying safety standards and regulations, creating potential risks for global security and stability.
The proposal
Creates international AI oversight framework involving multiple countries. Establishes monitoring mechanisms and coordination procedures for cross-border AI systems and research activities.
The impact
Affects AI companies, researchers, governments, and nations developing AI. Changes how AI projects operate internationally and requires coordination with foreign partners.
International coordination helps prevent dangerous AI development that could harm people worldwide. Countries sharing information makes it harder for risky projects to proceed unsupervised. Coordinated standards create safer outcomes for everyone.
Sets uniform rules so all countries follow similar AI safety standards. Prevents countries from gaining unfair advantages by ignoring safety rules. Creates fair competition based on innovation rather than regulatory shortcuts.
Requires countries to share information about major AI projects. Helps detect problems early before they become serious. Makes AI development less secretive and more accountable.
Shows America wants to cooperate with other nations on important issues. Builds trust through shared goals and joint oversight. Positions the U.S. as a leader in responsible AI governance.
International requirements and approval processes add delays to American AI projects. Other countries' slower regulations could hold back U.S. companies competing globally. May reduce America's competitive advantage in AI technology.
International agreements are difficult to enforce when countries disagree. Some nations might ignore rules without real consequences. Verification of compliance requires expensive monitoring systems.
U.S. AI projects require approval from international bodies. Other countries influence American technology decisions. Reduces America's ability to act independently on technology policy.
Gives dictatorships a say in global AI rules they can ignore privately. Authoritarian countries gain legitimacy through participation without real commitment. May help bad actors learn security measures they can circumvent.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.