Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Renews funding for undergraduate research programs at the National Science Foundation.
The problem
The undergraduate research experiences program at NSF needs reauthorization to continue supporting student researchers and maintain momentum in science education.
The proposal
The bill reauthorizes the Research Experiences for Undergraduates program at the National Science Foundation to continue providing funding and oversight.
The impact
College students studying science gain research opportunities. Universities benefit from program funding. The science workforce gains trained early-career researchers.
Undergraduate research programs help students gain hands-on experience in labs and field work. This prepares them for careers in science and engineering fields. Early experience builds skills needed for advanced research.
Investing in undergraduate research training helps maintain American leadership in science and technology. Countries with strong research pipelines develop innovation faster. This supports long-term economic competitiveness.
Research programs bring funding to colleges and universities nationwide. This money supports faculty and facilities. Universities use these programs to attract better students.
Research programs can help recruit underrepresented groups into science fields. Early exposure encourages students to pursue science careers. This builds a broader talent pool.
Reauthorizing the program costs taxpayer money. The bill does not specify funding amounts or budget details. Federal spending on science programs adds to the national budget.
The bill summary is minimal and lacks specific information about changes or improvements. Without details, it is unclear what problems the reauthorization addresses. Congress may debate unclear provisions.
Large universities with existing research infrastructure may receive more benefits than smaller schools. Well-established programs attract more funding and students. This could increase educational inequality.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.