Latest action: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Creates financial literacy and consumer protection standards for financial services.
The problem
Many Americans lack understanding of financial products and services, leading to poor decisions and vulnerability to fraud or exploitation by financial institutions.
The proposal
Establishes requirements for financial institutions to provide clear disclosures, consumer education programs, and standards for fair financial practices in the banking sector.
The impact
Affects consumers using financial services, banks and financial institutions required to comply with new standards, and financial regulators overseeing implementation.
Clearer information helps everyday people understand loans, credit cards, and savings options. This allows families to make smarter choices about their money and avoid costly mistakes.
Stronger disclosure requirements and education programs help protect consumers from scams and predatory lending. People are less likely to fall victim to deceptive financial practices.
Standardized practices create a level playing field where smaller financial institutions compete fairly with larger banks. Clear rules benefit responsible companies.
Informed consumers make better financial decisions, which reduces defaults and strengthens the overall financial system. Healthier personal finances support broader economic health.
Banks must spend money to create new programs, train staff, and update systems to meet requirements. These costs may be passed to customers through higher fees.
Strict regulations can slow down development of new financial products and services. Companies may be cautious about offering innovative solutions.
Enforcing consistent standards across different types of financial institutions is difficult. Regulators need sufficient resources and clear rules to make the law work effectively.
Excessive requirements could burden smaller financial institutions more than large ones. This might reduce competition and customer choices.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5639
Portal for Appraisal Licensing Act of 2026
S 1564
Floodplain Enhancement and Recovery Act
HR 1190
Expanding Access to Capital for Rural Job Creators Act
HR 7730
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.