Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Act funds local bird habitat protection and stewardship programs across U.S. communities.
The problem
Bird populations and habitats face threats from development, climate change, and land degradation. Local communities lack resources for effective conservation and habitat restoration efforts.
The proposal
Bill establishes funding mechanisms and programs for local communities to protect, restore, and manage bird habitats. Creates stewardship initiatives and grants for habitat conservation work.
The impact
Local governments, conservation groups, and communities gain resources for bird protection. Landowners may face new regulations. Wildlife benefits from habitat restoration efforts.
Funding habitat restoration helps endangered and declining bird species recover. Healthy bird populations support ecosystems and provide natural pest control.
Communities and local organizations gain direct funding to solve problems specific to their regions. Local control allows targeted, effective conservation strategies.
Habitat restoration and stewardship programs create employment in land management, monitoring, and restoration work. Local economies benefit from conservation spending.
Restored habitats create green spaces improving community recreation and air quality. Wetland restoration can reduce flooding and improve water quality.
New federal funding requires budget allocation and potential tax implications. Some view habitat programs as unnecessary government expenditure.
Habitat protection may limit how private landowners use their property. Regulations could prevent certain agricultural or development activities.
Programs require coordination between federal, state, and local agencies. Bureaucratic complexity may slow project execution and effectiveness.
Funding may favor certain regions or habitat types over others. Rural and urban areas might receive disproportionate resources.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.