Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates tax benefits for people saving money for egg freezing and fertility treatments.
The problem
Fertility treatments and egg freezing are expensive. Many people cannot afford to save for these costs without financial hardship.
The proposal
Establishes tax-advantaged savings accounts allowing people to set aside pre-tax money for egg freezing, fertility treatments, and related medical expenses.
The impact
People seeking fertility services gain tax savings. Healthcare and fertility industry may see increased demand. Government collects less tax revenue.
Tax-advantaged accounts make expensive treatments more affordable for middle and lower-income families. This removes financial barriers to people pursuing biological parenthood.
By reducing costs, the policy may enable more people to pursue fertility treatment and build families. This could support reproductive choice.
Increased demand for fertility services could boost clinics, labs, and related businesses. This creates jobs and economic activity in the sector.
Builds on familiar account models like HSAs and FSAs. This reduces complexity and implementation costs compared to entirely new programs.
Tax-advantaged accounts mean less money collected by the government. This reduces funding available for other programs or increases deficits.
People with higher incomes benefit more from tax deductions. Low-income families who cannot afford to save may not benefit.
The policy saves taxes but does not reduce what fertility clinics charge. Treatment costs remain high, limiting access for many people.
The bill may focus only on biological reproduction through egg freezing. Other family-building paths like adoption may not receive equal support.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2024 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.