Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows organic farms to participate in federal agricultural programs.
The problem
Organic farms may face barriers accessing government farm programs designed primarily for conventional agriculture, limiting their growth and competitiveness.
The proposal
Opens federal agricultural programs to organic farms by removing restrictions or requirements that prevent organic producers from participating in existing assistance.
The impact
Organic farmers gain access to federal support; taxpayers fund expanded programs; conventional farmers may see changed competitive conditions.
Organic farming is growing in demand. Federal support helps organic farmers expand production and compete fairly. This increases the supply of organic products consumers want.
Organic farming practices avoid synthetic pesticides and fertilizers. Federal support encourages these practices, reducing chemical runoff into water supplies and protecting soil health.
Organic farmers work under tighter profit margins than conventional farms. Program access helps stabilize their income and reduce financial risk from crop failures.
Federal programs can encourage more farmers to transition to organic methods. This shifts agriculture toward more sustainable long-term practices.
Expanding program access costs taxpayer money. The government must budget for additional payments to organic farmers, increasing agricultural spending.
Conventional farmers may view this as unfair preference for organic competitors. It could create tension between agricultural groups competing for limited program funds.
Without a detailed summary, it's unclear how programs will change or be administered. This creates uncertainty for all farmers about eligibility and requirements.
Large organic operations might benefit more than small family farms. Complex federal programs sometimes favor bigger producers with resources to navigate them.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10157
Freedom to Home Distill Act
S 5301
Voice for Farm Workers Act
S 5303
Supporting Our Farm and Food System Workforce Act
HR 10058
Summer Meals and Learning Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.