Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill would classify prediction markets as gambling and regulate them accordingly.
The problem
Prediction markets operate in legal gray areas. Regulators debate whether they function as gambling or legitimate forecasting tools. Current rules remain unclear.
The proposal
The bill would legally define prediction markets as gambling activities subject to gambling regulations and oversight by relevant federal agencies.
The impact
Prediction market platforms, traders, and users face new legal restrictions. Businesses operating these markets must comply with gambling laws or cease operations.
Classifying prediction markets as gambling triggers consumer safeguards and fraud protections. Users gain clearer rights and dispute resolution processes. Regulatory oversight prevents deceptive practices.
Gambling classification enables consistent tax collection on prediction market winnings. States gain regulatory revenue through licensing fees. Government funding increases for enforcement and oversight.
The bill removes regulatory ambiguity that currently exists. Businesses and users gain definitive legal guidance. Consistent national standards replace patchwork state approaches.
Gambling regulations typically include responsible gambling measures and addiction support. Users accessing prediction markets would gain access to these protective resources.
Prediction markets serve legitimate forecasting purposes for businesses and research. Gambling classification may eliminate valuable tools for economic prediction and decision-making. Innovation in predictive analytics could be hindered.
Gambling regulations impose licensing costs, compliance staff, and operational restrictions. Small platforms may shut down unable to meet gambling law requirements. Market consolidation could reduce competition.
Other countries treat prediction markets as legitimate forecasting tools. U.S. restrictions could move activities offshore to less-regulated jurisdictions. American companies lose competitive advantage in this sector.
Prediction markets focus on forecasting outcomes, not entertainment or chance. Classifying them identically to casino gambling misrepresents their purpose. Users may not view these as gambling activities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 4668
Protect College Sports Act of 2026
HR 9723
Fit Future Act
HRES 1487
Recognizing the 1960 University of Missouri Tigers Football Team for its undefeated regular season, Orange Bowl victory, and claim to the 1960 National Championship.
HRES 1482
Recognizing 100 years of American Legion Baseball and the American Legion World Series, and honoring the city of Shelby, North Carolina, for serving as the permanent home of the American Legion World Series.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.