Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 36 - 8.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
MATCH Act addresses international affairs coordination and matching requirements between U.S. agencies.
The problem
U.S. government agencies lack coordinated matching mechanisms for international affairs initiatives, reducing efficiency and accountability in bilateral and multilateral engagements.
The proposal
Establishes matching fund requirements and coordination protocols between federal agencies for international affairs programs and diplomatic initiatives.
The impact
Federal agencies, international partners, and U.S. diplomatic operations are affected through new coordination mandates and funding matching procedures.
Creates structured matching requirements that encourage different federal agencies to work together on international projects. This reduces duplication and makes U.S. international efforts more unified and effective.
Matching fund requirements create clear tracking of resources and shared responsibility between agencies. This makes spending more transparent and easier to monitor.
Matching mechanisms can incentivize partner nations to contribute resources to joint initiatives. This builds commitment and shared investment in bilateral and multilateral programs.
Matching requirements can multiply available funding by encouraging multiple funding sources for international programs. This stretches limited government dollars further.
New matching requirements add administrative layers and paperwork for agencies. This could slow down diplomatic responses and international initiatives when speed matters.
Agencies must find matching funds from existing budgets, potentially taking money from other programs. Smaller agencies may struggle to meet matching requirements.
Rigid matching rules may prevent agencies from responding quickly to international crises or opportunities that don't fit matching formulas. Diplomacy sometimes requires fast, decisive action.
International partners must also provide matching funds, which some developing countries cannot afford. This could exclude important but poorer allies from programs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.