Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
This bill would increase the number of Supreme Court justices from nine to thirteen.
The problem
Supporters argue the current nine-justice Court is outdated and doesn't reflect modern governance needs or population changes since the Court's size was last set in 1869.
The proposal
The bill expands the Supreme Court from nine justices to thirteen justices, adding four new positions that the President would fill with Senate approval.
The impact
This affects the Supreme Court's power and balance. It impacts everyone who relies on Court decisions about laws, rights, and government actions. Presidents gain power to reshape the Court.
The Supreme Court has had nine justices since 1869. The U.S. population and legal system have grown much larger. Adding justices could reflect modern governance needs and handle increased caseloads more effectively.
A sitting President could appoint four new justices, allowing them to shape the Court's direction for decades. Supporters see this as a way to align the Court with current democratic preferences.
Proponents argue recent Court decisions have shifted significantly in one direction. Adding justices could restore ideological balance and ensure diverse viewpoints in decisions affecting all Americans.
More justices could mean more cases heard and faster decisions on important legal matters. This could reduce delays in the appeals process and provide relief for lower courts.
Critics argue expanding the Court for political gain weakens the judiciary's independence from politics. This could encourage future Congresses to repeatedly expand the Court whenever they disagree with rulings.
Opponents worry this politicizes the Court-expansion process. If one party expands the Court, the opposing party might expand it further when in power, leading to an endless cycle of partisan Court-packing.
Critics debate whether Congress has the power to change the Court's size for political purposes. Some argue it violates the spirit of separation of powers and checks and balances.
Adding four justices requires salaries, staff, offices, and administrative resources. This creates additional government spending without clear evidence it improves judicial efficiency or outcomes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.