Latest action: Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Updates outdated law references in agriculture, education, and public lands codes.
The problem
Federal laws contain references to provisions that have been moved or reorganized in the U.S. Code. These outdated citations create confusion and technical errors in current legislation.
The proposal
Corrects and updates statutory references in titles 7, 20, and 43 of the U.S. Code to point to the correct current locations of legal provisions.
The impact
Government agencies, legal professionals, and citizens using federal agricultural, education, and public lands laws will have accurate references for understanding and implementing these regulations.
Fixing incorrect law references makes it easier for agencies and citizens to find the right rules. This prevents mistakes that happen when people use old citations.
Agencies spend less time tracking down the correct provisions when citations are accurate. This saves taxpayer money on administrative work.
When laws reference the right sections, courts and officials can apply rules consistently. This protects people's rights and ensures fair treatment.
Technical corrections maintain the integrity of federal law by ensuring all cross-references remain valid and current.
While helpful, this bill only fixes citations without changing any actual rules or policies. The real-world effects are mostly administrative.
If the corrections are made incorrectly, they could create new confusion rather than fix old problems. Careful review is needed.
The bill lacks a detailed summary, making it hard for the public to understand exactly what references are being changed.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10157
Freedom to Home Distill Act
S 5301
Voice for Farm Workers Act
S 5303
Supporting Our Farm and Food System Workforce Act
HR 10058
Summer Meals and Learning Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.