Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to reduce taxes on diesel fuel used in transportation and agriculture.
The problem
Diesel fuel costs have increased significantly, raising transportation and farming expenses. Supporters say lower taxes would reduce costs for businesses and consumers.
The proposal
The bill would lower federal excise taxes on diesel fuel. This aims to reduce the tax burden on diesel purchases for vehicles and equipment.
The impact
Truckers, farmers, and fuel consumers would pay less in taxes. Government would collect less tax revenue from diesel fuel sales.
Reduced diesel taxes could lower costs for trucking companies and delivery services. These savings might be passed to consumers through lower prices on goods.
Agricultural businesses use significant diesel fuel for equipment. Lower taxes could reduce farming expenses and support rural economies.
Lower fuel costs make American transportation and agriculture more competitive. This could help domestic industries compete with foreign companies.
Lost tax revenue adds to the federal budget deficit unless other spending is cut. This increases long-term national debt.
Lower diesel taxes mean the government collects less money for road maintenance and infrastructure. This could reduce funding for highways and bridges.
Lower fuel taxes might encourage more diesel use and carbon emissions. This could increase air pollution and climate impacts.
Large trucking and farming companies would benefit more than small businesses or consumers. Middle and low-income workers might not see significant savings.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.