Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Gives money to local governments to help prevent evictions through diversion programs.
The problem
Many renters face eviction during financial hardship. Eviction diversion programs help people avoid losing their homes by finding alternatives like payment plans or mediation.
The proposal
The bill directs HUD to create a grant program giving federal money to local governments to start or expand eviction diversion programs in their communities.
The impact
Renters at risk of eviction, local governments, and landlords are affected. Renters get help keeping homes, communities get resources, and landlords may work with diversion programs instead of going to court.
Eviction diversion programs give renters options like payment plans or temporary help before losing their homes. This keeps families stable and reduces homelessness in communities.
Diversion programs resolve issues outside court, saving local governments money on eviction cases. Courts handle fewer cases, freeing up time for other matters.
Landlords can get paid through diversion programs instead of losing money during eviction proceedings. Both sides work together to find solutions.
Federal grants help local governments build programs tailored to their specific needs and challenges. Communities get resources without using only local tax money.
The bill requires federal money through HUD grants, adding to overall government spending. Some argue this money could be used elsewhere or that states should fund their own programs.
The bill doesn't specify how effective programs must be or what outcomes are required. Without clear standards, results may vary widely between communities.
If diversion programs often lower what landlords receive, some may be less willing to participate. This could reduce the program's effectiveness in certain cases.
Local governments may lack experience running diversion programs or struggle to coordinate with courts and landlords. Successful launch depends on local capacity and cooperation.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5652
Build American Efficiency Act
HR 4646
Whistleblower Protection Act of 2025
HR 1640
HEIRS Act of 2025
HR 10168
Veterans Housing Opportunity Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.