Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates taxes on artificial intelligence and protects workers from job displacement.
The problem
Rapid AI development may eliminate jobs and reduce tax revenue. Workers need protection from economic disruption caused by automation technology.
The proposal
Establishes tax on AI systems and creates worker protection programs. Likely includes retraining, income support, and job transition assistance funded by AI taxes.
The impact
Workers in automation-affected industries gain protection. Tech companies pay new taxes. Government gains revenue for assistance programs. Job market adapts to AI integration.
AI taxes fund retraining and income assistance for displaced workers. This helps people transition to new jobs and maintain financial stability during economic shifts.
Creates safety net for employees whose jobs are replaced by AI. Includes job training, benefits, and transition assistance to reduce hardship.
Encourages gradual AI adoption with responsible workforce planning. Allows workers and communities time to adapt to technological changes.
Taxes on AI systems create government income for social programs. Ensures tech companies contribute to addressing impacts of their innovation.
AI taxes increase expenses for companies using automation technology. Costs may be passed to consumers through higher prices for products and services.
AI taxes could discourage research and development in technology companies. This might reduce American competitiveness against countries without similar taxes.
Defining and taxing AI systems is technically difficult and creates enforcement challenges. Companies may debate what counts as AI and how to measure it fairly.
Taxes and retraining alone may not solve all job displacement problems. Some workers in affected industries may struggle finding new employment regardless.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.