Latest action: Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
John Moolenaar (R-MI)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill regulates locomotive emissions and environmental standards for rail transportation.
The problem
Rail locomotives contribute to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental standards for trains need updating to address climate and health concerns.
The proposal
The bill establishes new emission standards and environmental requirements for locomotives. It may mandate cleaner fuel types or technology upgrades for rail operators.
The impact
Railroad companies must comply with new rules. Consumers may see higher shipping costs. Air quality improves in areas near rail lines. Rail workers adapt to new equipment.
Stricter locomotive emissions reduce air pollution near rail corridors and communities. This improves public health, especially for people living near train tracks.
Lower emissions from locomotives help reduce greenhouse gases. This supports national efforts to address climate change through transportation sector improvements.
Reduced pollution lowers respiratory illnesses and other health problems linked to air quality. Communities near rail lines experience fewer pollution-related diseases.
New emission standards encourage development of cleaner locomotive technology and alternative fuels. This creates opportunities for innovation in the rail industry.
Railroad companies must buy new equipment or retrofit existing locomotives. These costs may be passed to consumers through higher shipping prices and ticket fares.
Smaller rail operators may struggle to afford expensive equipment upgrades. Large companies can more easily absorb compliance costs.
Railroads need time and resources to upgrade fleets and meet new standards. Transitional periods and compliance challenges could disrupt service.
U.S. railroads face higher costs than international competitors without similar regulations. This could affect the industry's economic position globally.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.