Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Vince Fong (R-CA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Congress votes to reject EPA rules about ship pollution near California ports.
The problem
The EPA created pollution rules for ocean-going ships at California ports. Congress is considering whether to block this rule using the disapproval process.
The proposal
This resolution disapproves the EPA's rule on nonroad engine pollution standards and ocean-going vessel emissions at California berths, effectively rejecting it if passed.
The impact
Shipping companies, California ports, and coastal communities affected by maritime emissions would see changes in pollution requirements and compliance obligations.
Shipping companies would avoid expensive equipment upgrades and operational changes required by the EPA rule. This could lower costs for businesses and potentially reduce shipping expenses passed to consumers.
Ocean-going vessel operators could maintain current operations without new federal restrictions. This supports jobs and efficiency in the shipping sector.
Congressional review can prevent regulatory agencies from creating rules without legislative input. This preserves the balance of power between branches of government.
Without these EPA standards, ships at berth would emit more harmful pollutants. Air quality in California coastal communities would likely worsen, affecting public health.
Ship emissions contain particulates and chemicals linked to respiratory disease, heart problems, and cancer. Rejecting pollution limits exposes port communities to greater health risks.
Maritime emissions contribute to climate change. Blocking pollution standards contradicts efforts to reduce greenhouse gases and meet environmental targets.
Frequent congressional disapprovals of agency rules can undermine the EPA's ability to enforce environmental laws and protect public welfare effectively.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.