Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
This bill would reject EPA approval of California's clean car pollution standards.
The problem
The EPA approved California's stricter vehicle emission rules and zero-emission vehicle requirements. Some members of Congress oppose this regulatory decision and want to overturn it.
The proposal
The bill uses the Congressional Review Act to disapprove the EPA's rule granting California a waiver to set its own vehicle pollution standards stricter than federal rules.
The impact
If passed, it would block California's advanced clean car program, affecting automakers, consumers buying cars, and air quality in California and states following California's standards.
Blocking California's stricter standards means car manufacturers have one national standard instead of meeting different requirements. This could reduce production costs and complexity.
Maintaining one federal standard across all states simplifies compliance for the auto industry and prevents a patchwork of different state requirements.
Companies facing fewer regulatory requirements might pass savings to consumers through lower new car prices, making vehicles more affordable.
California's standards reduce vehicle emissions more than federal rules. Blocking them would allow more pollutants in the air, harming air quality in California and other states that follow its rules.
Higher vehicle emissions lead to more respiratory diseases, heart problems, and other health issues, especially in urban areas and communities near highways.
The Clean Air Act allows California to set its own standards. This bill overrides that legal power granted to states by federal law.
California's rules push automakers toward electric and zero-emission vehicles. Blocking them delays the shift away from fossil fuels and renewable energy adoption.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.