Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Updates the New Source Review permitting process for industrial facilities.
The problem
New Source Review requires permits for industrial changes. Current rules may slow business decisions or create uncertainty about when permits are needed.
The proposal
The bill changes how and when industrial facilities need pollution permits for new equipment or modifications.
The impact
Industrial companies, environmental regulators, and communities near factories would be affected by new permitting rules.
Clearer permitting rules help companies decide faster when to upgrade equipment. This could speed up business investment and job creation.
Simpler permitting rules could cut paperwork and costs for companies. Less bureaucracy may help smaller manufacturers compete.
Clear rules help companies plan ahead and avoid legal disputes. Companies know exactly when they need permits.
Easier permitting may encourage factories to upgrade aging equipment. New investments could improve local infrastructure.
Weaker permitting rules might allow more pollution without review. Communities could face worse air or water quality.
Fewer permit requirements mean less chance for public input on factory changes. Local residents have less say in decisions affecting their area.
Simplified rules make it harder to catch pollution violations. Regulators may struggle to monitor and enforce standards.
Less oversight of industrial changes could increase toxic emissions near homes and schools. Public health risks may rise in industrial areas.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.