Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reorganizes federal circuit courts of appeals structure and jurisdiction.
The problem
The federal appeals court system may need updates to handle current caseloads, geographic needs, and operational efficiency in the modern legal system.
The proposal
The bill reorganizes circuit court districts, potentially adjusts judicial positions, and modifies jurisdictional boundaries among federal appeals courts.
The impact
Federal judges, lawyers, litigants, and parties seeking appeals would experience changes in which court hears their cases and how cases are processed.
Reorganizing courts could reduce backlog and speed up case decisions. Balancing caseloads across circuits might mean faster resolutions for people waiting for appeals.
Adjusting circuit boundaries could bring courts closer to some communities. This might reduce travel costs and time for attorneys and parties involved.
The current circuit court structure dates to 1980. Modernizing it reflects population changes and current litigation patterns in America.
Adding or redistributing judicial positions could help courts handle modern case volume. This supports the overall justice system's ability to function properly.
Reorganizing courts requires moving offices, reassigning judges, and retraining staff. These changes cost money and create disruption during implementation.
Changing which court hears appeals creates confusion about jurisdiction and procedure. Lawyers and judges need time to adapt to new rules.
During reorganization, some cases might be delayed while the system adjusts. Cases caught between the old and new structure could be affected.
Reorganizing courts raises questions about whether changes favor particular viewpoints. Circuit court restructuring can affect which judges hear major cases.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.