Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to strengthen U.S. partnerships and engagement in the Pacific region.
The problem
The United States needs to maintain and expand its diplomatic and strategic relationships in the Pacific to address regional security challenges and economic competition.
The proposal
The bill establishes programs and frameworks to increase U.S. engagement, cooperation, and partnership initiatives throughout the Pacific region.
The impact
Pacific nations, U.S. government agencies, and American businesses are affected through expanded diplomatic efforts and potential new partnerships.
The bill aims to deepen U.S. ties with Pacific partners. This can improve security cooperation and make alliances stronger. Better relationships help address shared challenges.
Greater engagement in the Pacific helps the U.S. maintain its position in an important region. This supports long-term strategic interests and economic opportunities.
Expanded partnerships can create new trade opportunities for American businesses. Pacific nations represent growing markets for U.S. goods and services.
New diplomatic programs and initiatives require federal funding. The bill may increase government spending without clear budget details provided.
The bill has no official summary released yet. This makes it hard to evaluate specific impacts or whether the approach is effective.
Increased focus on Pacific engagement might divert resources from other foreign policy goals. This could affect work in other important regions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.