Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
This resolution would reject EPA rules about pollution from ships near California ports.
The problem
The EPA created new pollution control standards for ocean-going vessels at berth in California. Some argue these rules are too strict or hurt shipping businesses and the economy.
The proposal
Congress would use a special process to disapprove and cancel the EPA's pollution rule about ships at dock, blocking it from taking effect.
The impact
Shipping companies, port workers, and California residents would be affected. Companies might face fewer restrictions, while air quality near ports could be impacted.
Relaxing pollution rules could reduce expenses for vessel operators. This might lower shipping fees and make goods cheaper for consumers.
Rejecting the rule removes compliance requirements that companies must follow. Businesses can avoid spending money on pollution control equipment.
Some argue EPA shouldn't override California's own environmental standards. This resolution protects state authority to set its own pollution rules.
Ships produce exhaust that pollutes the air around California ports. Canceling the rule means more pollution affecting nearby communities and workers.
Air pollution from ships causes respiratory diseases, asthma, and other illnesses. People living near ports would experience worse health outcomes without these standards.
Congress would override federal environmental protection standards. This weakens the EPA's ability to enforce national pollution limits.
Ships produce greenhouse gases contributing to climate change. The rule helps reduce these emissions; rejecting it works against climate goals.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.