Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Congress votes to reject EPA pollution rules for commercial harbor ships in California.
The problem
The EPA created new pollution control standards for commercial harbor craft operating in California. This resolution allows Congress to block or disapprove of these regulations.
The proposal
This joint resolution uses a congressional disapproval process to reject the EPA's California harbor craft pollution control rule and related nonroad engine standards.
The impact
Shipping companies, California ports, and environmental quality are affected. The rule's rejection would change pollution limits for commercial harbor vessels operating near California.
Rejecting stricter pollution rules could reduce compliance costs for commercial harbor operators. Companies would spend less on equipment upgrades and modifications to meet tighter emission standards.
Blocking the rule removes compliance requirements and paperwork for harbor craft operators. This streamlines operations for the maritime industry and reduces administrative costs.
Less strict standards could help California ports compete with other U.S. ports. Ships would not need expensive retrofits, making operations in California more attractive economically.
Rejecting pollution limits means commercial harbor ships can emit more pollutants. This increases smog and respiratory illness risk for people living near California ports and harbors.
Increased emissions from harbor vessels harm air quality and create health problems. Children, elderly people, and those with asthma face greater health risks near ports.
California has authority to set its own emission standards under the Clean Air Act. Blocking this rule undermines California's ability to protect its own air quality.
Higher harbor pollution affects ocean water quality and marine ecosystems. This could harm fish populations and coastal environments around California's ports.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2024 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.