Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Congress votes to reject EPA's approval of California's stricter vehicle emission standards.
The problem
The EPA approved California's Advanced Clean Car Program, allowing the state tougher pollution rules than federal standards. Some oppose this decision.
The proposal
This resolution disapproves the EPA's decision, attempting to block California's vehicle emission pollution control standards.
The impact
California's car emission rules would be rejected. Automakers, environmental groups, and state governments face uncertainty about vehicle pollution standards.
One national vehicle standard makes it easier for automakers to design and sell cars nationwide. Companies won't need different vehicles for different states.
Manufacturers may reduce costs if they don't need to meet multiple state standards. These savings could lower car prices for consumers.
Federal preemption prevents state-by-state rules that create confusion. Businesses know exactly what rules apply everywhere.
Companies avoid expensive restructuring to meet different state requirements. This keeps business operations simpler and potentially cheaper.
Blocking California's standards means fewer strict emission rules. Air pollution could increase, especially in California and other states that follow California's standards.
States lose power to protect their own environment and residents. This limits local control over pollution that directly affects state citizens.
Weaker emission standards mean more vehicle pollution in the air. This causes more respiratory disease and other health problems in affected communities.
California's standards push automakers toward cleaner vehicles. Rejecting them slows progress toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions and fighting climate change.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.