Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Congress votes to reject EPA's rule allowing California stricter car pollution standards.
The problem
EPA approved California's request for stricter greenhouse gas emission standards for vehicles. Some lawmakers want to reverse this decision through congressional disapproval.
The proposal
Joint resolution to reject the EPA rule that granted California a waiver to set its own vehicle emission standards, using the Congressional Review Act process.
The impact
Vehicle manufacturers, California, environmental groups, and consumers affected by potential changes to car emission rules and standards.
A single national car emission standard reduces complexity for manufacturers. This could lower vehicle production costs and prices for consumers nationwide.
Companies wouldn't need to design different vehicle models for different state standards. This streamlines production and reduces business expenses.
Federal preemption prevents a patchwork of state regulations. This maintains consistent rules across state borders.
Rejecting California's stricter standards means less reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. This undermines efforts to combat climate change and air pollution.
California has historically led on clean air standards. Blocking this waiver removes a state's ability to protect its own air quality and health.
Stricter emissions reduce air pollution and related health problems like asthma. Rejecting stronger standards could harm public health, especially in California.
The Clean Air Act specifically allows California emission waivers. Disapproving this rule challenges established environmental law and procedures.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.