Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Congress votes to block EPA's rule allowing California stricter car pollution standards.
The problem
The EPA approved California's Advanced Clean Car Program, which sets stricter vehicle emission standards than federal rules. Congress members believe this creates competing regulations.
The proposal
This joint resolution disapproves the EPA's decision and would block the rule if passed, using congressional authority to overturn the agency action.
The impact
Car manufacturers, California, environmental groups, and drivers face changes. Manufacturers may avoid building stricter cars. California and states following its standards lose pollution control authority.
One national standard is easier for car companies than different standards per state. This could reduce production costs and vehicle prices for consumers.
This uses Congress's power to review and reject agency rules. It reminds agencies that Congress has oversight authority over their decisions.
National standards prevent a patchwork of state rules. This keeps the auto industry operating under consistent requirements across the country.
California's standards reduce harmful pollution more than federal rules. Blocking this rule keeps pollution levels higher, hurting air quality.
States like California have historically led environmental protection. This strips away their ability to protect their own citizens from pollution.
Dirtier air causes more respiratory illness and health problems. States and individuals pay more for healthcare when air pollution increases.
Stricter emissions standards reduce greenhouse gases and fight climate change. Blocking this rule slows progress toward reducing carbon emissions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.