Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill would allow artificial intelligence to help resolve legal disputes between parties.
The problem
Current arbitration processes can be slow and expensive. Parties seek faster, cheaper ways to resolve disagreements without going to court.
The proposal
The bill enables parties to use AI systems to help arbitrate disputes. AI would assist in reviewing evidence, suggesting solutions, and making recommendations in legal cases.
The impact
Businesses, consumers, and individuals using arbitration would access faster dispute resolution. Courts might see fewer cases. Workers and small businesses could face new processes.
AI can process large amounts of information quickly, potentially reducing the time needed to resolve disagreements. This could help businesses settle disputes faster and resume normal operations sooner.
Automating parts of arbitration could reduce legal fees and arbitrator expenses. Businesses and individuals might save money on dispute resolution compared to traditional litigation.
AI systems apply rules uniformly without personal bias, potentially leading to more consistent outcomes across similar cases. This could create fairer treatment across different disputes.
Moving disputes to AI-assisted arbitration could reduce cases going to court, helping overburdened court systems handle cases more efficiently.
Complex disputes involving relationships, context, or unusual situations may not be fairly resolved by AI alone. Important human factors might be missed by automated systems.
Only parties who can afford AI-assisted arbitration may benefit, potentially leaving low-income individuals and small businesses unable to use these faster, cheaper methods.
If AI makes wrong decisions, it may be unclear who is responsible and how to appeal or fix the error. Parties might have no clear way to challenge unfair AI decisions.
Without clear rules about how AI should work in disputes, different systems might operate very differently. Companies could use poorly designed AI that favors their interests.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.