Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to provide tax benefits for workforce development and training investments.
The problem
Workers may lack access to affordable training. Employers struggle to find skilled workers. Existing education programs may not match job market needs.
The proposal
Creates or modifies tax incentives for businesses that invest in employee training, education, and workforce development programs.
The impact
Affects employers offering training programs, employees seeking skill development, and potentially reduces tax revenue unless offset by other provisions.
Tax incentives could motivate more employers to invest in training programs. This helps workers gain better skills for higher-paying jobs. More skilled workers can improve business productivity.
A better-trained workforce helps businesses compete globally. Companies may grow faster when employees have modern skills. This could create more job opportunities overall.
Focuses resources on training for jobs that are actually in demand. Helps match workers to available positions faster. Reduces long-term unemployment in certain sectors.
Uses tax incentives rather than government programs to expand training. Lets employers decide what training their workers need. Reduces burden on taxpayer-funded job training.
Tax incentives reduce government income from business taxes. This money might otherwise fund public services. Unless offset, could increase deficits or require budget cuts elsewhere.
Large corporations can afford to take advantage of tax breaks more easily. Small businesses may not benefit as much or know about the program. Could increase inequality between big and small employers.
Incentives focus on employer-provided training, not unemployed workers. People between jobs may struggle to access these benefits. Does not guarantee training is accessible to all who need it.
Unclear what training counts for the tax break. Employers could claim the credit for existing training they already do. Difficult to measure whether new jobs actually result.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.