Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to limit mass surveillance programs by government agencies.
The problem
Government agencies conduct large-scale surveillance of Americans' communications and activities, raising concerns about privacy rights and constitutional protections.
The proposal
Establishes restrictions on mass surveillance programs, requires warrants for certain data collection, and creates oversight mechanisms for intelligence gathering.
The impact
Affects government agencies, intelligence operations, law enforcement practices, and all Americans' privacy rights and data security.
Limits government access to personal communications and data without individual warrants. Strengthens Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches.
Creates oversight mechanisms requiring transparency and reporting on surveillance activities. Allows independent review of government data collection practices.
Addresses citizen concerns about unchecked surveillance revealed in past disclosures. Demonstrates commitment to constitutional protections and democratic values.
Reduces risk of surveillance being misused against political opponents or disfavored groups. Creates legal standards protecting vulnerable populations.
Restrictions on data collection could slow counterterrorism and counterintelligence investigations. May reduce government ability to detect threats quickly.
New oversight systems require funding, personnel, and infrastructure changes. May burden already stretched government budgets.
Strict warrant requirements might encourage use of gray-area collection methods. Could shift surveillance to less transparent programs.
Limits may reduce intelligence advantages against foreign adversaries. Other nations may maintain broader surveillance capabilities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.