Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to strengthen defense technology sharing between the US, UK, and Australia.
The problem
The US, UK, and Australia have a military partnership called AUKUS. Current laws may limit how quickly they can share advanced defense technology with each other.
The proposal
The bill would remove or change restrictions that prevent faster sharing of military technology and defense information between these three allied nations.
The impact
Defense contractors, military personnel, and intelligence agencies in all three countries would be affected by changes to technology-sharing rules and procedures.
Faster technology sharing would help the US, UK, and Australia work together more effectively against shared threats. It could improve military coordination and response times.
Removing barriers could increase business opportunities for defense contractors in all three countries. Companies could develop and sell military technology more easily.
Closer cooperation on defense technology could help these nations defend themselves more effectively. Sharing innovations prevents duplication of expensive research efforts.
Allied nations could combine their research efforts to develop new military technology more quickly. This could give them advantages in global security challenges.
Sharing sensitive military technology with more countries increases the risk that it could be stolen or leaked to rival nations. Even trusted allies can have security breaches.
If the US shares advanced military technology with allies, it may lose the advantage of having unique weapons and defense systems. This could affect long-term security.
Removing restrictions could mean Congress has less control over who gets US military technology. This reduces democratic oversight of important defense decisions.
Developing new shared technology systems could be expensive. US taxpayers might pay more while benefits go partly to other countries.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.