Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Remove fees that certain people pay when setting up payment plans with the IRS.
The problem
Low-income and struggling taxpayers face additional fees when arranging installment agreements to pay taxes owed, making debt harder to manage.
The proposal
Eliminates installment agreement fees for eligible individuals, reducing the total cost of setting up a payment plan with the IRS.
The impact
Low-income taxpayers benefit by paying less to arrange tax payments. The IRS loses fee revenue. Tax compliance may improve for struggling payers.
Removes extra costs for people with low incomes who need time to pay taxes. This makes it easier for them to set up payment plans without additional financial burden.
When payment plans are cheaper, more people might use them instead of ignoring tax debt. This could help the IRS collect more taxes overall.
Eliminating fees removes obstacles preventing eligible taxpayers from formally arranging payments. This simplifies the process for people already struggling financially.
By limiting the benefit to certain individuals, the bill focuses help on those who need it most rather than all taxpayers.
The IRS currently collects fees from installment agreements. Eliminating these fees means lost income for the federal government that must be made up elsewhere or accepted as reduced revenue.
If plans become free for some people, it could encourage those who can pay immediately to delay payment and use installment plans instead, reducing immediate tax collection.
The bill is vague about which individuals qualify for fee elimination. Without clear eligibility rules, implementation could be complicated or unfair.
Processing more installment agreements without fee revenue could strain IRS resources, potentially slowing service for other taxpayers.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.