Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bans people convicted of weaponization offenses from filing certain legal claims.
The problem
Some individuals convicted of weaponization-related crimes may file lawsuits. Congress wants to prevent these individuals from pursuing specific legal claims.
The proposal
The bill prohibits people convicted of weaponization offenses from filing or maintaining certain types of claims in court proceedings.
The impact
Convicted weaponization offenders lose the ability to pursue specific legal claims. Courts and justice systems must implement new eligibility restrictions.
Prevents individuals convicted of serious weaponization crimes from using courts to advance related claims. May reduce opportunities for criminals to exploit the legal system.
Courts avoid processing claims from individuals with weaponization convictions. Could reduce caseloads in some jurisdictions.
May prevent weaponization offenders from pursuing legal action that could affect victims. Protects victims from additional legal complications.
Bans a group of people from accessing courts for certain claims. Raises constitutional concerns about equal access to the justice system.
Bill lacks detail on what qualifies as a weaponization offense. Courts may struggle interpreting which convictions trigger the ban.
May block legitimate legal claims by convicted individuals. Could prevent people from defending themselves in court.
Courts need clear guidelines to identify and process ban eligibility. Administrative burden increases for judicial systems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.