Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 512.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Establishes a comprehensive U.S. strategy for the South China Sea region.
The problem
The South China Sea involves competing territorial claims, regional tensions, and strategic importance for global trade and security interests.
The proposal
The bill directs the U.S. government to develop and implement a coordinated strategy addressing South China Sea challenges, including diplomacy and security measures.
The impact
Affects U.S. foreign policy, military operations, trade partners in Asia, and international relations in the region.
Gives the U.S. a clear, consistent approach to the region instead of mixed messages. Helps allies know where America stands on regional issues.
Protects shipping routes used by American businesses and consumers. Keeps global commerce flowing through important waterways.
Coordinates with neighboring countries that share concerns about the region. Builds united front on shared interests.
Clear policies can reduce misunderstandings and accidental conflicts. Shows peaceful intentions while defending U.S. interests.
A strong U.S. strategy might upset China and lead to more confrontation. Could make the situation more hostile rather than calmer.
The bill doesn't specify how much this strategy will cost taxpayers. May require significant military spending or resources.
Without an official summary, it's unclear exactly what the strategy includes. Congress and public don't know the specific actions planned.
Could commit America to conflicts that aren't directly our problem. Might drag the U.S. into disputes between Asian nations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.