Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 497.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Reduces U.S. spending on international affairs to save taxpayer money.
The problem
The bill addresses concerns about high U.S. government spending on international programs and foreign aid, aiming to reduce federal expenditures.
The proposal
The bill cuts funding for international affairs programs and redirects resources, though specific details are not yet available in public summaries.
The impact
Affects foreign aid recipients, international organizations, diplomatic operations, and taxpayers through potential budget reductions in international spending.
Reducing international spending could lower overall government budget deficits and potentially reduce taxpayer burden. This appeals to fiscal conservatives seeking to cut federal costs.
Funds currently used internationally could potentially be redirected to domestic programs like infrastructure, healthcare, or education. This focuses resources on American citizens.
Scrutinizing international spending encourages careful evaluation of how taxpayer money is used abroad. This promotes government efficiency and responsible budgeting.
Reducing international affairs funding may limit America's ability to engage diplomatically worldwide. This could reduce U.S. influence on global issues.
Many international programs provide humanitarian aid, disease prevention, and disaster relief to vulnerable people globally. Cuts could increase suffering and instability abroad.
Reducing preventive international spending on development and stability may lead to more expensive crises requiring future military or emergency response. Prevention is often cheaper than reaction.
International affairs funding supports trade relationships and business opportunities abroad. Cuts could harm American companies doing international business.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.