Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 509.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Cory Booker (D-NJ)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Establishes U.S. policy and initiatives for the Eastern Mediterranean region.
The problem
The Eastern Mediterranean region faces geopolitical complexity with multiple stakeholders. The U.S. needs a coordinated strategy for this important area.
The proposal
The bill creates a framework for U.S. engagement in Eastern Mediterranean affairs, likely including diplomatic, economic, and security initiatives in the region.
The impact
U.S. government agencies, regional partners, businesses, and communities in Eastern Mediterranean countries are affected by new policy direction and resource allocation.
A coordinated U.S. strategy can improve relationships with allied nations in the Eastern Mediterranean. This may enhance stability and cooperation on shared interests.
Clear U.S. policy may encourage trade and investment in the region. American businesses could benefit from increased engagement opportunities.
Focused attention on this region helps the U.S. address geopolitical challenges effectively. It demonstrates commitment to an important part of the world.
A dedicated framework allows the U.S. to advance its values and interests through diplomacy. It provides structure for consistent engagement.
New initiatives may require significant federal spending. Taxpayers could bear costs without clear guarantees of return on investment.
Increased U.S. involvement could be seen as taking sides in local disputes. This might worsen relationships with some regional actors.
Coordinating policy across multiple agencies and countries is complex. The bill may be difficult and expensive to execute effectively.
Without an official summary, the bill's specific requirements and goals are unclear. This makes it hard to assess true costs and benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.