Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Updates Coast Guard leadership structure and modernizes how the agency operates.
The problem
The Coast Guard's leadership system may not match current operational needs and modern government practices, potentially affecting efficiency and effectiveness.
The proposal
Modernizes Coast Guard leadership positions, organizational structure, and management practices to better align with contemporary operational requirements.
The impact
Coast Guard personnel, military operations, maritime security, and federal government management may be affected by organizational and leadership changes.
Modernizing leadership positions could improve decision-making and reduce bureaucratic delays. This allows the Coast Guard to respond faster to maritime emergencies and security threats.
Updated organizational structure may help the Coast Guard run more smoothly. Personnel could have clearer roles and responsibilities, reducing confusion.
Modernized positions and structures may attract more qualified leaders to the Coast Guard. This could improve overall agency performance and public service.
Updating the Coast Guard to match current best practices in government and military leadership ensures consistency with other federal agencies.
Reorganizing leadership and structure requires spending money on training and administrative changes. These costs could be significant for the federal budget.
Changing leadership structure may create confusion among staff during the transition period. This could temporarily reduce the Coast Guard's effectiveness.
Without details on specific changes, it is unclear if modernization will actually improve operations. The bill's vague nature makes it hard to predict outcomes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.